Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Cedric Leonard
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:56, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- R. Cedric Leonard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO. No recognition outside of the WP:FRINGE sources that swirl around belief in ancient astronauts. jps (talk) 18:46, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I was unable to find any coverage in reliable, independent sources. I found mention only in fringe books. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:58, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unable to find reliable sources outside Fringe. The books are obscure and not notable from what I can see in library and user holdings. These kinds of experts best chance for notability is newspaper articles and community involvement around UFO events, but just looks like a fringe writer for fringe readers. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 17:37, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.